Skip to main content

Protect Your Truth

Your truth management repository contains your organization's most strategic thinking. Treat it with appropriate security.

The Risk​

Every tool in your truth management workflow (AI assistants, version control, transcription services) is a potential leak point for your competitive advantage. Your documented strategies, failed experiments, and decision frameworks are exactly what competitors would love to access.

Core Principles​

Consider Local-First Tools​

  • Use locally-hosted LLMs for processing sensitive documentation
  • Deploy on-premise transcription for strategic conversations
  • Run AI editing tools on company-owned hardware when handling trade secrets

Match Security to Sensitivity​

  • Public truth: Open source repos for public-facing principles
  • Internal truth: Private repos with strict access controls
  • Executive truth: Air-gapped systems for board-level strategy

Architect for Access Control​

Multiple truth repos with different security levels beats one repo with complex permissions:

  • company-public/ - Culture and values safe to share
  • company-internal/ - Operational playbooks for employees
  • company-strategic/ - Competitive strategies for leadership only

Audit Your Tool Chain​

Before documenting sensitive truth, ask:

  • Where is this data processed? (OpenAI, Anthropic, local)
  • Who has access to the repository? (GitHub, GitLab, self-hosted)
  • What leaves your network? (API calls, backups, logs)

The Trade-off​

Security measures can create barriers to collaboration. Find your balance:

  • What truth creates value by being shared widely?
  • What truth loses value if competitors access it?
  • What tools enable both protection and productivity?

Your truth management system is only as secure as its weakest integration. Design accordingly.

Further Reading​