Skip to main content

Inclusive Technological Advancement

The principle that AI and related technologies must be designed, governed, and deployed so that benefits are shared broadly, not concentrated among already-advantaged groups and geographies.

What it means​

New technologies widen inequality before they narrow it. The wealthy adopt first, the early adopters compound their advantages, and the gap between the top and the bottom opens faster than the market can close it. If nobody is actively working on inclusion from the start, the gap calcifies.

Inclusive technological advancement is the commitment to close that gap by design rather than by accident. It is the stance that the worth of AI progress should be measured by how fast the floor rises, not by how far the frontier advances for those already at it.

There are four practical layers of inclusion:

  1. Who participates. Are people from every income level, region, ability, and community in the design process, or only the already-advantaged?
  2. What gets built. Is the tool accessible (language, hardware requirements, bandwidth), or does it assume infrastructure the user does not have?
  3. What outcomes count. Are we measuring social impact and broad-based flourishing, or only financial metrics that reward concentrated use?
  4. How it is governed. Who decides the rules, and who is protected when things go wrong?

A solution that is technically impressive but socially unavailable is not an advancement of anything that matters.

Why this matters for the Applied AI Society​

AAS exists to empower leaders to apply the world's most advanced AI technologies responsibly to strengthen their businesses, communities, and humanity's collective future. The phrase "humanity's collective future" is not ornamental. It is a commitment to humanity broadly, not to the subset of humanity that already has early access.

This stance is locked into the Applied AI Canon as Tenet XII: "Raise the floor, not just the ceiling." At the team scale, this is Raise the Floor. At the humanity scale, this is inclusive technological advancement.

The K-shaped economy thesis makes the stakes concrete. AI is splitting the world into hyperagents (humans amplified by AI) and everyone else. Without deliberate inclusion work, the split becomes permanent and global. AAS's entire operating model (free public docs, open-source playbooks, hyperlocal chapters, a talent pipeline that routes practitioners into underserved communities) is a bet that the split is still mutable.

What it looks like in practice​

  • Literacy as a public good. The public docs are free. The Supersuit Up workshop playbook is open source. Chapter leaders and universities run derivative courses in their own communities without permission or license fees. Nothing is gatekept.
  • Hyperlocal over centralized. Applied AI Society runs through local chapters, not through one centralized product. The chapter model is deliberately lightweight so a student group, a community leader, or a church can stand one up without needing resources only wealthy cities have.
  • Portable tooling over lock-in. We teach the harness, not the wrapper. We build on portable, sovereign foundations so that practitioners in low-resource contexts are not dependent on subscription economies they cannot afford.
  • Design for the edge case. Curriculum must work in low-bandwidth contexts, on older hardware, across languages, and for people who are not already AI-fluent. If it only works for practitioners in Austin or LA, it is not actually inclusive.
  • Partnership with inclusion-first institutions. We align with global organizations doing this work at scale and learn from their frameworks.

Credit where due: AIFOD​

Language matters. We adopted "inclusive technological advancement" as a named value after encountering the work of the AI for Developing Countries Forum (AIFOD), a Vienna-based NGO with 6,000+ members across 150+ countries, dedicated to ensuring AI serves as a catalyst for sustainable development, inclusivity, and social equity in developing nations.

AIFOD operates at a different scale than AAS. They are a global policy and convening forum aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, hosting summits at UN offices in Geneva and Vienna and running initiatives like AIFOD AID (AI as an engine for development), AIFOD IRB (independent research and review across industries), and AIFOD FAIR (certification frameworks built by communities for communities). They also explicitly reframe the goal as moving developing nations from "AI consumers to creators."

AAS sits downstream of that work. We are the practitioner-scale infrastructure that puts applied AI literacy in the hands of people who would otherwise be left behind. Where AIFOD advocates, convenes, and sets standards at the forum level, AAS trains, equips, and deploys at the community level. Both are needed. The language of "inclusive technological advancement" is AIFOD's contribution to the shared vocabulary. We adopt it gratefully.

The uncomfortable implication​

Any practitioner, business owner, or investor optimizing purely for the already-advantaged is participating in the split, whether they name it that way or not. Inclusive technological advancement is not a soft value statement. It is a structural test. If the work you are doing is only accessible to the top 10% of the economy, you are building the ceiling, not the floor.

AAS's bet is that the people who pass this test will outperform the people who do not, because the winners of the next decade will be the ones who built on the widest foundation.

Further Reading​